I just want clarification about something.
On page 12 of this book Florida says ....the era saw a whole series of crucial invention that revolutionized electricity...Thomas Edison's electric lightbulb and advances in alternation current (AC), Nikola Tesla's alternating-current motor, and George Westinghouse's electric transformer and advances in direct current (DC).
And then on page 14: George Westinghouse was another great systems-builder. ...recognizing the inefficiencies inherent in Edison's use of direct current, Westinghouse....
Aren't one of those statements factually wrong?
I'm not very far in the book, but so far it seems to be using the argument that two things that happen sequentially necessarily prove that the first one caused the second. That seems like all the medical studies that suggest that because people who eat A are healthy it must be because they eat A without taking a multitude of other factors into account.
I fully acknowledge that I may not be up to understanding this brilliant work and await someone to explain my errors of misunderstanding.Get more detail about The Great Reset: How New Ways of Living and Working Drive Post-Crash Prosperity.
No comments:
Post a Comment